On 4th February 2014, Christian kruse Wrote:
> On 04/02/14 12:38, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > ISTM that the phrase "Request queue" is not used much around the lock.
> > Using the phrase "wait queue" or Simon's suggestion sound better to
> at least me.
> > Thought?
> Sounds reasonable to me. Attached patch changes messages to the
> following:
> Process holding the lock: A. Wait queue: B.
> Processes holding the lock: A, B. Wait queue: C.

This looks good to me also.

Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to