* Greg Stark (st...@mit.edu) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> > wrote: > > The install failed, of course, because extensions want to install in > > $PGROOT/share/extensions. > > Homebrew sounds kind of confused. Having a non-root user have access > to make global system changes sounds like privilege escalation > vulnerability by design.
I've not played w/ Homebrew myself, but it's installing into /usr/local
and presumably that includes installing things into /usr/local/bin, so
the notion that installing something from Homebrew isn't already (and
intended to be) making global system changes doesn't quite line up.
The end-admin would have to modify the system-installed postgresql.conf
anyway to enable this other directory. David wasn't suggesting that
Homebrew *should* be able to do so, he was pointing out that it *can't*,
which all makes sense imv.
> However putting that aside, it is fairly standard for software to
> provide two directories for extensions/modules/plugins/etc. One for
> distribution-built software such as /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ and
> another for sysadmin customizations such as
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp. The same idea as /usr/share/perl and
> /usr/local/share/perl or with Python or anything else.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
