Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > I've applied this and backpatched to 9.3 and 9.2, which is as far back as > it goes cleanly.
> In 9.1 the build system looked significantly different, which makes it > strange since the original report in this thread was about 9.1 but the > patch supplied clearly wasn't for that. > Does somebody want to look at backpatching this to 9.1 and earlier, or > should we just say that it's not fully supported on those Windows versions > unless you apply the registry workaround? The question I think needs to be asked is not that, but "what about the mingw and cygwin builds?". regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers