On 27-03-2014 10:15, Bruce Momjian wrote: > When we made OIDs optional, we added an oid status display to \d+: > > test=> \d+ test > Table "public.test" > Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description > --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+------------- > x | integer | | plain | | > --> Has OIDs: no > > Do we want to continue displaying that OID line, or make it optional for > cases where the value doesn't match default_with_oids? > That line is still important for those tables that have oids. Once a while I see "with oids" set (mainly by mistake or misinformation).
The 8.0 (last version that have default_with_oids = on) is dead for more than 3 years. Is it time to remove the d_w_o or even announce to remove it in 2 releases? Regarding to remove the "Has OIDs" line, it seems that it is just noise since almost all tables does not have oids. However, if you remove that line you'll have to fix the regression tests and also can break third part extensions that use \d+ (we can live with that). If we agree to remove d_w_o, don't worry with that line because it will be removed soon. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
