Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-04-03 09:43:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I object to the latter; you're proposing to greatly increase the warning >> noise seen with any compiler that issues a warning for this without caring >> about .h vs .c. For somebody who finds gcc -pedantic unusable, I would >> think you'd have a bit more sympathy for people using other compilers.
> Yea, but which compilers are that? The only one in the buildfarm I could > find a couple weeks back was acc, and there's a flag we could add to the > relevant template that silences it. I also don't think that very old > platforms won't usually be used for active development, so a louder > build there doesn't really have the same impact as noisy builds for > actively developed on platforms. Didn't we already have this discussion last year? The main points are all mentioned in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyjnc4b+8y01grnal52gtpbzc3zsc4sdnw4lgxhqt3...@mail.gmail.com regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
