Etsuro Fujita <> writes:
> (2014/04/10 0:08), Tom Lane wrote:
>> TBH I think that's barely the tip of the iceberg of cases where this
>> patch will get the wrong answer.

>> Also, I don't see it doing anything to check the ordering
>> of multiple index columns

> I think that the following code in index_pathkeys_are_extensible() would
> check the ordering:
> +     if (!pathkeys_contained_in(pathkeys, root->query_pathkeys))
> +             return false;

Hm ... if you're relying on that, then what's the point of the new loop
at all?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to