Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Ok, I am convinced that your suggestion - truncating
> query_pathkeys by removing eventually no-op entries - seems
> preferable and will have wider effect naturally - more promised.
> I won't persist with the way this patch currently does but the
> new patch of course can't come up within this CF. I will agree if
> you decide to make this patch 'Returned with Feedback'. (I feel a
> little sad for 'Rejected' but you can justly do that if you think
> that the patch comming up next is utterly different from this
> one:()
I marked it as "returned with feedback".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
