On May 27, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> In either case, the problem remains of exactly what to call the
> e2fsprogs-derived implementation.  It does seem that people who are
> familiar with these libraries call it that, but I'm worried that such
> a name will confuse those not so familiar.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to