Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
> On 27 May 2014 18:33:48 EEST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If we were going to do it like that, I'd vote for
>>
>> --with-uuid={ossp,e2fs,bsd}
>>
>> with no default at present (ie you can't say just "--with-uuid",
>> though we'd have the option to allow that in future). But I doubt
>> this is better than the --with-foo-uuid spelling.
> FWIW, --with-uuid=foo looks much clearer to me.
OK, I'll make it so.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
