On 5/27/14, 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not terribly happy about pushing such a change post-beta1 either,
> but it's not like this isn't something we've known was needed.  Anyway,
> what's the worst case if we find a bug here?  Tell people not to use
> uuid-ossp?

Mainly some more discussion time would have been nice.  Also, while the
old ossp-based uuid was broken in some cases, it had a well-defined
workaround.  The new code introduces a whole new dimension of potential
portability issues.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to