On 5/27/14, 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not terribly happy about pushing such a change post-beta1 either, > but it's not like this isn't something we've known was needed. Anyway, > what's the worst case if we find a bug here? Tell people not to use > uuid-ossp?
Mainly some more discussion time would have been nice. Also, while the old ossp-based uuid was broken in some cases, it had a well-defined workaround. The new code introduces a whole new dimension of potential portability issues. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
