Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: >> lo_new() or lo_make()? An earlier draft of the patch that added >> lo_create(oid, bytea) had a similar function named make_lo().
It appears that lo_make() has a small plurality, but before we lock that name in, there was one other idea that occurred to me: the underlying C function is currently named lo_create_bytea(), and that seems like not an awful choice for the SQL name either. Any other votes out there? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers