On 2014-06-12 10:48:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> >> lo_new() or lo_make()?  An earlier draft of the patch that added
> >> lo_create(oid, bytea) had a similar function named make_lo().
> It appears that lo_make() has a small plurality, but before we lock
> that name in, there was one other idea that occurred to me: the
> underlying C function is currently named lo_create_bytea(), and
> that seems like not an awful choice for the SQL name either.
> Any other votes out there?

I prefer lo_create_bytea() or even lo_create_from_bytea(),


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to