Joe Conway <> writes:
> On 06/18/2014 07:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> With the attached patch on top of yours, I see no leak anymore.

> I can confirm that -- rock solid with 1 million iterations. I assume
> that should not be back-patched though?

Well, we usually think memory leaks are back-patchable bugs.  I'm
a bit worried about the potential performance impact of an extra
memory context creation/deletion though.  It's probably not noticeable in
this test case, but that's just because dblink() is such a spectacularly
expensive function.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to