Stephen Frost wrote: > Any further thoughts on this? I haven't tried to go implement anything > yet but I'm definitely concerned that we may run into a keyword issue > with ALTER TABLE, but I don't really want to add 'TABLES' either. > Anyone have any other suggestions or ideas?
I thought that the suggestion to use MOVE was the most appropriate. However I also concur that re-using MOVE from its current cursor-related meaning would be troublesome from several PoVs, so if there's a synonym of MOVE that we can use, that'd probably be better. I don't like ALTER TABLES myself; and having an ALTER TABLE command that affects several tables seems counterintuitive as well. How about RELOCATE ALL [ TABLES | INDEXES | ... ] IN TABLESPACE foo TO bar ? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
