On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > At 2014-06-25 16:13:19 +0900, masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Categorizing this parameter to CONN_AUTH_SETTINGS looks strange to me > > Oh yes. Sorry, I meant to respond to this point in my original review, > but forgot. Yes, CONN_AUTH_SETTINGS is just weird. But I couldn't find > an obviously better answer either. > > LOGGING_WHAT would work with log_line_prefix support, but I don't think > there was as much support for that version of this patch. I personally > don't have a strong opinion about whether it's worth adding an escape. > >> STATS_COLLECTOR also looks a bit strange not only for cluster_name but >> also update_process_title, though... > > True. Is UNGROUPED the only answer?
Or create new group like REPORTING_WHAT? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
