Michael Paquier wrote: > After sleeping on it, I have put my hands on the postgres_fdw portion and > came up with a largely > simplified flow, resulting in the patch attached.
[...] > Ronan, what do you think of those patches? I have nothing more to add, and I > think that they should be > looked by a committer. Particularly the FDW API that is perhaps not the best > fit, but let's see some > extra opinions about that. I looked the the API and ist documentation, and while I saw no problem with the API, I think that the documentation still needs some attention: It mentions a "local_schema", which doesn't exist (any more?). It should be mentioned that the CreateForeignTableStmt's base.relation->schemaname should be set to NULL. Also, it would be nice to find a few words for "options", maybe explaining a potential application. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
