Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > > With that, I am marking this patch as ready for committer. > > I've started looking at this patch. I wonder whether it's really such > a great idea to expect the FDW to return a list of parsetrees for > CREATE FOREIGN TABLE commands; that seems like a recipe for breakage > anytime we change the parsetree representation, say add a field to > ColumnDef. The alternative I'm thinking about is to have the FDW pass > back a list of strings, which would be textual CREATE FOREIGN TABLE > commands.
.oO(json blobs as in the DDL deparse patch ...) (I don't know if they are really suitable. I have no idea how this patch works.) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
