Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:02:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > So? If it hits the installation-wide limit, you'll have the same
> > problem; and at that point the (presumably runaway) app would have
> > sucked up all the connections, denying service to other apps using other
> > databases. I think Marc's point here is to limit his exposure to
> > misbehavior of any one client app, in a database server that is serving
> > multiple clients using multiple databases.
>
> That would indeed be a useful item. The only way to avoid such
> exposure right now is to run another back end.
Added to TODO:
* Allow limits on per-db/user connections
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
