On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:58:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:12:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Tom's idea of doing this as part of the already added per-user/per-db > > > settings seems like a good direction to take. > > > > Yes, but how? The current implementation has a setting column in > > pg_shadow, and another in pg_database. Is the idea to create a separate > > pg_settings table or something like that? > > Are you asking how to do per-db-user combination settings, like User A > can have only two connections to database B? Seems we should get > per-user and per-db settings working first and see if anyone needs > combination settings.
Well, now that I think about it... the "user local to database" (those with the @dbname appended and all that) idea may very well cover the ground for this. But I'm not actually asking, because I don't need it. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "Aprender sin pensar es inutil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
