Dave Page writes: > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary > distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as > supported if no-one disagrees...
I disagree. We document as supported those platforms that build out of the box, not those that build somehow, somewhere, by someone. Rather than advocating methods to manually edit your system headers we should try to find out what the problem really is, such as by analyzing config.log. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
