Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:58:12PM -0000, Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin > > > installation before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,) > > > > I guess my WAG was wrong... :,) > > I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)
Larry was kind enough to answer this one for me. :,) > > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., > > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y > > successfully. I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking > > the maintainer for this upgrade. > > OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from > CVS. Yes. Nevertheless, I have posted my request: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01740.html > > 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in: > > > > #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO > > #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c)) > > #define ftello(a) ftell((a)) > > #endif > > > > conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries: > > > > int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int)); > > off_t _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *)); > > > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve > > this one yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated. I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way into the next Cygwin release: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html > Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in > the build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I > guess not! A quick and *dirty* fix for this problem is to temporarily delete the above two entries from your stdio.h file. Jason ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster