On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > This isn't a showstopper, but needs some thought. As the patch stands, it > uses a single key container called "PostgreSQL server key container", and > makes no attempt to delete the keys after they're no longer used. That > works, but it leaves the key lying on the system.
What about using something like 'PostgreSQL ' || system_identifier? Would it make sense to have pg_ctl unregister delete the key container, or do we need a separate facility for that? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
