* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > Yeah, that's what I remembered. There was an attempt to make that > > change at one point, but it was reverted due to the lack of batching > > ability in libpq (without resorting to cursors, as I recall...), > > requiring double the memory usage. Still, if pqsecure_read and > > pqsecure_write are sufficient to make the ODBC driver work, that's good > > news. I had been worried it did other things with the OpenSSL struct > > beyond just using those. > > Um, libpq has recently gained the ability to return result fragments, > right? Those didn't exist when libpq-ification of odbc was attempted, > as I recall -- perhaps it's possible now.
I was trying to remember off-hand if we still had that or not.. I thought there was discussion about removing it, actually, but perhaps that was something else. I agree that having that would definitely help with the ODBC driver. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature