On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]
<kbak...@its.jnj.com> wrote:
> My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or 
> writing to the pipe (and associated handling of SIGPIPE), it just relied on 
> postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.

I'm not following.

> Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would 
> you be the logical choice to implement the change?
> I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want 
> to step on anyone's toes.

I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but
I may be able to help review.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to