Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J] wrote: > Please let me know if more discussion is required, or if it would be > reasonable for me (or someone else of your choosing) to work on the > coding effort (perhaps targeted for 9.5?) > If on the other hand it has been decided that a QNX port is not in the > cards, I would like to know (I hope that is not the case given the > progress made, but no point in wasting anyone's time).
As I recall, other than the postmaster startup interlock, the other major missing item you mentioned is SA_RESTART. That could well turn out to be a showstopper, so I suggest you study that in more depth. Are there other major items missing? Did you have to use configure --disable-spinlocks for instance? What's your compiler, and what are the underlying hardware platforms you want to support? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
