On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > One thing I was pointed out, it is the reason why I implemented > DDL support, is that intermediation of c-language function also > loads the extension module implicitly. It is an advantage, but > not sure whether it shall be supported from the beginning.
That is definitely an advantage of the DDL-based approach, but I think it's too much extra machinery for not enough real advantage. Sounds like we all agree, so ... > I'd like to follow this direction, and start stripping the DDL support. ...please make it so. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
