On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Rahila Syed <rahilasye...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> Thank you for comments. >> >>>Could you tell me where the patch for "single block in one run" is? >> Please find attached patch for single block compression in one run. > > Thanks! I ran the benchmark using pgbench and compared the results. > I'd like to share the results. > > [RESULT] > Amount of WAL generated during the benchmark. Unit is MB. > > Multiple Single > off 202.0 201.5 > on 6051.0 6053.0 > pglz 3543.0 3567.0 > lz4 3344.0 3485.0 > snappy 3354.0 3449.5 > > Latency average during the benchmark. Unit is ms. > > Multiple Single > off 19.1 19.0 > on 55.3 57.3 > pglz 45.0 45.9 > lz4 44.2 44.7 > snappy 43.4 43.3 > > These results show that FPW compression is really helpful for decreasing > the WAL volume and improving the performance.
Yeah, those look like good numbers. What happens if you run it at full speed, without -R? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
