On 09/02/2014 04:52 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
On 09/02/2014 04:32 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
I think it's much better to make it the default behaviour in plpgsql2
than to add a new syntax to plpgsql,
because then we don't have to argue what to call the keyword or where to
put it.
Then you'll have to argue what the *other* syntax should look like. And not
everyone agrees on the default either, see Kevin's email. Designing a new
language is going to be an uphill battle, even more so than enhancing
current plpgsql.
Any ideas on what the *other* syntax could look like?
Well, I'm in the camp that the current default is fine...
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
