On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > SINGLETON UPDATE ...? >> >> Does it come with built-in spell check? :-) It's a bit long to write. >> I like STRICT, that maps good to what we already have with SELECT ... >> INTO STRICT. > > Spell checker coming in plpgsql3! ;-) > > Anyway, as you have seen, the problem is not creating plpgsql2 --- you > could do that yourself on your own and distribute it. What you want is > for the community to develop/maintain it, and as you have also seen, > everyone uses plpgsql slightly differently, so if you want the community > to maintain it, you are only going to get some of the things you want.
Very true, I totally agree. But what do you think about, STRICT UPDATE ...? > Of course, the idea of upgrading plpgsql is long overdue, so it is very > good we are all talking about it. I'm very glad you share that opinion. :-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
