On 09/01/2014 02:04 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote: > Please share your wish list of things you would want in plpgsql2 which > are not possible to implement in plpgsql because they could possibly > break compatibility.
Well, if I were designing a new procedural SQL extension language, I wouldn't base it on the bastard child of ADA and SQL89. I would come up with something new. One of the critical features such a new language would have would be the ability to dynamically generate queries *without* using string manipulation and EXECUTE. Otherwise, improvements to PL/pgSQL amount to the proverbial porcine makeover. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
