Without having read the entire thread ...

On 09/01/2014 05:04 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
 From the top of my head, these are Things I personally would want to
see in plpgsql2:
+ Make UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE throw error if they didnt' modify exactly 1
row, as that's the most common use-case, and provide alternative syntax
to modify multiple or zero rows.


I think this is a completely flawed proposal "by definition". SQL itself does not make such assumption and as a SET oriented language, never should. A SET is zero or more tuples. Would you also suggest that the PostgreSQL backend throw an ERROR if an UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE doesn't modify exactly 1 row? If not, explain why there should be a difference between SQL executed from the frontend and SQL executed by a PL/pgSQL function.

-1 from me.


+ Change all warnings into errors

I suggest being slightly more selective on that one.


Regards,
Jan

--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to