On Sat, Sep  6, 2014 at 12:26:55AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I have developed the attached patch which causes pg_upgrade to preserve
> > the transaction epoch.  I plan to apply this for PG 9.5.
> I would say this is a simple bug and should be back patched to 9.4 and
> 9.3. We're only going to continue to get complaints from people
> running into this.

Yes, I did think about that, but it seems like a behavior change. 
However, it is tempting to avoid future bug reports about this.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to