Bruce Momjian <> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:24:17AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I think the reason nobody's responding is because nobody has anything
>> significant to add. It's a behavior change from not-working to
>> working. Why wouldn't it be backpatched?

> OK, Greg seems to be passionate about this.  Does anyone _object_ to my
> back-patching the epoch preservation fix through 9.3.  Tom?

Not I.  This is a data-loss bug fix, no?  Why would we not back-patch it?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to