On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:58:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:24:17AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> >> I think the reason nobody's responding is because nobody has anything
> >> significant to add. It's a behavior change from not-working to
> >> working. Why wouldn't it be backpatched?
> > OK, Greg seems to be passionate about this.  Does anyone _object_ to my
> > back-patching the epoch preservation fix through 9.3.  Tom?
> Not I.  This is a data-loss bug fix, no?  Why would we not back-patch it?

Seems I was thinking of another pg_upgrade feature we decided not to
backpatch, though I can't find it now.

Backpatched through 9.3.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to