On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I did some more experimentation on this. Attached is a patch that >>> JUST does #1, and, ... > >> ...and that was the wrong patch. Thanks to Heikki for point that out. >> Second try. > > But the results you gave in the previous message were correctly > attributed?
The patch I attached the first time was just the last commit in the git repository where I wrote the patch, rather than the changes that I made on top of that commit. So, yes, the results from the previous message are with the patch attached to the follow-up. I just typed the wrong git command when attempting to extract that patch to attach it to the email. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
