On 2014-09-29 21:48:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> > What about the attached patch then?
> >
> Thanks for this update. This looks good. Here are a couple of small
> comments:
> 1) This sentence is correct English, but I don't recall seeing in the docs
> such a formulation:
> +        Can only be used on slots using a output plugin supporting textual
> +        output.
> I'd rather rewrite 'It can only be used' or 'this function can only be
> used'. I imagine that you could add a reference to
> logicaldecoding-output-mode as well.


> 2) s/a output/an output/g

> 3) The formulation here seems vague as a plugin that generates textual
> output can call pg_logical_slot_peek_binary_changes as well:

I've commented on this before: an output plugin doesn't call
pg_logical_slot_peek_binary_changes - if at all it's the other way

> -        except that changes are returned as <type>bytea</type>.
> +        except that changes are returned as <type>bytea</type> and that it
> can
> +        be used on slots using output plugins that only support binary
> output.

Imo that's pretty much implied because it references the !binary
version. But I guess it doesn't hurt to be explicit. How about:
" ... on output plugins using any form of output, including binary."?


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to