Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, Jul  4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel.  One less
>> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine
>> idea to me ...

> Is this still an open item?

I haven't done anything about it ...

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to