Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel. One less >> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine >> idea to me ...
> Is this still an open item? I haven't done anything about it ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers