On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel. One less > >> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine > >> idea to me ... > > > Is this still an open item? > > I haven't done anything about it ... >
If the final decision is get rid the toast table for pg_seclabel and as I've time then I did it. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/toasting.h b/src/include/catalog/toasting.h index a4af551..c3128b8 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/toasting.h +++ b/src/include/catalog/toasting.h @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ DECLARE_TOAST(pg_constraint, 2832, 2833); DECLARE_TOAST(pg_description, 2834, 2835); DECLARE_TOAST(pg_proc, 2836, 2837); DECLARE_TOAST(pg_rewrite, 2838, 2839); -DECLARE_TOAST(pg_seclabel, 3598, 3599); DECLARE_TOAST(pg_statistic, 2840, 2841); DECLARE_TOAST(pg_trigger, 2336, 2337);
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
