At 2014-10-14 20:09:50 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> I think that's a good idea.
> 
> We could have pg_audit.roles = 'audit1, audit2'

Yes, it's a neat idea, and we could certainly do that. But why is it any
better than "ALTER ROLE audit_rw SET pgaudit.log = …" and granting that
role to the users whose actions you want to audit?

-- Abhijit


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to