On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> If REINDEX cannot work without an exclusive lock, we should invent some >> other qualifier, like WITH FEWER LOCKS. > > What he said.
But more to the point .... why, precisely, can't this work without an AccessExclusiveLock? And can't we fix that instead of setting for something clearly inferior? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
