On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While reviewing another patch, I have noticed that
recovery_min_apply_delay can have a negative value. And the funny part is
that we actually attempt to apply a delay even in this case, per se this
condition recoveryApplyDelay@xlog.c:
>         /* nothing to do if no delay configured */
>         if (recovery_min_apply_delay == 0)
>                 return false;
> Shouldn't we simply leave if recovery_min_apply_delay is lower 0, and not
only equal to 0?
>

Seems reasonable.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

Reply via email to