On 05/01/15 20:44, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just
configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(

Amen.  We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters
to be GUCs.

Well, there is an ongoing effort on that and I think the patch is very close to the state where committer should take a look IMHO, I have only couple of gripes with it now and one of them needs opinions of others anyway.

 Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to