On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just
> configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(

Amen.  We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters
to be GUCs.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to