On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just
> configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(

Amen.  We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters
to be GUCs.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to