On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Alexey Vasiliev <leopard...@inbox.ru> wrote:
>> To not modify current pg_usleep calculation, I changed
>> restore_command_retry_interval value to seconds (not milliseconds). In this
>> case, min value - 1 second.
> Er, what the problem with not changing 1000000L to 1000L? The unit of
> your parameter is ms AFAIK.
Of course I meant in the previous version of the patch not the current
one. Wouldn't it be useful to use it with for example retry intervals
of the order of 100ms~300ms for some cases?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to