On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:54 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > +1 on 128/256 character names. > >> /me runs and hides. > > /stands brazenly in the open and volunteers to try it if I don't get > clobbered within seconds.
I think the question is whether making lots of rows in system catalogs better is going to have undesirable effects on (a) the size of our initial on-disk format (i.e. how big an empty database is), (b) the amount of memory consumed by the syscache and relcaches on workloads that touch lots of tables/functions/whatever, or (c) CPU consumption mostly as a result of more cache line accesses for the same operation. If you can prove those effects are minimal, that'd be a good place to start. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers