Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On 2/13/15 10:20 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> Some of users of intarray contrib module wish to use its features with >> another kind of arrays, not only for int4 type. Suggested module >> generalizes intarray over other (not all) types op pgsql.
> I think this module should be merged with the intarray module. Having > two modules with very similar functionality would be confusing. Perhaps. I think it would be hard to remove intarray without breaking things for existing users of it; even if the functionality remains under another name. And surely we don't want to generalize intarray while keeping that same name. So it might be hard to get to a clean solution. Speaking of names, I can't avoid the feeling that it is a seriously bad idea to name an extension the same thing as an existing core type. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers