Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> When commit cae565e503 introduced FDW user mappings, it used this in
> getObjectDescription for them:
> appendStringInfo(&buffer, _("user mapping for %s"), usename);
> This was later mostly copied (by yours truly) as object identity by
> commit f8348ea32e wherein I used this:
> appendStringInfo(&buffer, "%s", usename);
> As it turns out, this is wrong, because the pg_user_mapping catalog has
> a two-column "primary key" which is user OID and server OID. Therefore
> it seems to me that the correct object description and identity must
> include both username and server name. I propose we change the above to
> this:
> appendStringInfo(&buffer, _("user mapping for %s in server %s"),
> usename,
> srv->servername);
+1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
word here. "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
