Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
>> word here.  "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".

> One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Hm, but then you'd have "user mapping for foo for server bar", which
doesn't read so nicely either.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to