On 06-03-2015 AM 09:18, Amit Langote wrote: > On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right >> word here. "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server". >> > > One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING) Oh, I see it's been done that way already. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
