On 22 March 2015 at 18:17, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm thinks.
> >
> > jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.
>
> All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
> is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
>

It looks like there's some other problems there too, but for the
exponential issue, I posted a patch here:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caaphdvordz8kcdfyzgrcpdeflmqk0f6u_78nj-jajxyj7uf...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to